PAPER CHASE NEWSBURSTDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.


Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Whole Foods seeks injunction against FTC on merger trial
Jay Carmella at 10:09 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Whole Foods Market [corporate website] filed an action [complaint, PDF] in the US District Court for the District of Columbia [official website] on Monday requesting an injunction barring the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) [official website] from holding an administrative trial regarding the company's merger with Wild Oats Market [corporate website]. The action also requests that any further proceedings be moved to federal court. The suit alleges that the FTC has a prejudgement on the case and that the company's due process rights are violated by the timing of the trial. The complaint regarding the prejudgement stems from the FTC publicly questioning the merger, including whether it violated anti-trust laws. John Mackey, co-founder and CEO of Whole Foods Market, said [press release]:
How can the same FTC sit as judge and jury at sometime in the future of the very same case in which it has already declared that the Whole Foods-Wild Oats merger is illegal and it's key expert witness is 'garbage'? The answer is - it shouldn't be allowed to. It has obviously already closed its mind. That's not our understanding of what due process and the principles of fundamental fairness are all about.
In addition, Whole Foods alleges the timing of the FTC trial violates their due process rights. The FTC is questioning the merger's impact in 29 different geographic jurisdictions. Whole Foods argues that five months is not adequate time to prepare for what it considers to be essentially 29 different trials.

In 2007, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit [official website] refused to block [JURIST report] the merger between Whole Foods and Wild Oats despite an appeal by the FTC. The court reviewed the case in August 2008 and ordered the federal district court to reconsider [JURIST report] the potential impacts of the merger on the market. The district court has not yet ruled on the matter.



Link | |  | print | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | Facebook page

For a one-stop snapshot of the latest legal news that matters, with breaking documents, new legal videos, live law-related webcasts, commentary by expert law professors and more - all updated through the day in real time, with no ads and no registration barriers - visit JURIST's homepage and check back often...


LATEST LEGAL NEWS

 FBI report shows reported hate crimes in US up two percent
2:17 PM ET, November 23

 Leaked documents question propriety of UK involvement in Iraq
2:02 PM ET, November 23

 Kenya committee unveils new draft constitution
1:04 PM ET, November 23

 click for more...

Get JURIST legal news on your intranet, website, blog or news reader!

LATEST FORUM

A Risk Worth Taking: Civilian Trials for Guantanamo Terror Suspects

L. Friedman/ V. Hansen
New England School of Law

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@pitt.edu