PAPER CHASE NEWSBURSTDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.


Friday, September 12, 2008

Third Circuit upholds denial of diet-drug settlement claim
Joe Shaulis at 11:39 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit [official website; JURIST news archive] on Thursday ruled [opinion, PDF] that a claimant had produced insufficient medical evidence to recover from a settlement fund established to compensate those harmed by the weight-loss medication known as fen-phen [FDA backgrounder]. The Philadelphia-based court affirmed a decision by the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania [official website] denying Gay Patterson's claim against the AHP Settlement Trust [trust website] as lacking a reasonable medical basis. Patterson alleges she suffers from moderate mitral regurgitation [Mayo Clinic backgrounder], or a leaky heart valve - a condition that would qualify her for compensation from the trust. She argued that the district court had erred by failing to accept a single frame of an echocardiogram as sufficient evidence of her condition and by relying instead on an auditing cardiologist's visual assessment of an echocardiogram. Chief Circuit Judge Anthony J. Scirica [official profile] wrote for the three-member panel:
We cannot agree with Patterson's argument that, in a borderline case such as this, the measurement of a single frame in an echocardiogram, without evidence showing that the
depicted jet is a true regurgitant jet, i.e., representative of the claimant’s actual level of mitral regurgitation, constitutes a reasonable medical basis for recovering Matrix compensation. To hold otherwise would permit claimants whose echocardiograms show an aberrant jet in a single frame to recover payment from the Trust.
Further, the court found that a physician's "eyeball" assessment is proper when an echocardiogram clearly indicates that the claimant's level of valve leakage is consistent with that of the general population.

The settlement fund resulted from class-action litigation [case backgrounder] against the company now known as Wyeth Pharmaceuticals [corporate website], which pulled its diet drugs Pondimin (fenfluramine) and Redux (dexfenflura) off the market [FDA press release] in 1997. Earlier that year, a Mayo Clinic study [text] linked fen-phen, a combination of the Wyeth drugs with the medication phentermine, to a rare heart-valve condition. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation later transferred all diet-drug cases in federal court to Pennsylvania's Eastern District. The court approved [order text] a settle agreement [materials] in 2000, leading to the establishment of the trust.



Link | |  | print | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | Facebook page

For a one-stop snapshot of the latest legal news that matters, with breaking documents, new legal videos, live law-related webcasts, commentary by expert law professors and more - all updated through the day in real time, with no ads and no registration barriers - visit JURIST's homepage and check back often...


LATEST LEGAL NEWS

 Iran court sentences ex-VP for role in post-election unrest
11:45 AM ET, November 22

 Rights group says Israel-Palestinian conflict claimed almost 9,000 lives in twenty years
10:30 AM ET, November 22

 DOJ dropping charges against Blackwater guard involved in 2007 Iraq shootings
9:40 AM ET, November 22

 click for more...

Get JURIST legal news on your intranet, website, blog or news reader!

LATEST FORUM

A Risk Worth Taking: Civilian Trials for Guantanamo Terror Suspects

L. Friedman/ V. Hansen
New England School of Law

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@pitt.edu