PAPER CHASE NEWSBURSTDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.


Wednesday, July 23, 2008

House committee begins investigation of FDA drug approvals
Deirdre Jurand at 11:30 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Two members of the US House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce [official website] began an investigation [information request, PDF; press release] Tuesday into whether the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allowed the continued sale of certain drugs that agency officials knew had been manufactured and sold using faulty data. The investigation began after the US Attorney for the District of Maryland filed a motion [text, PDF] with the district court early this month seeking to enforce subpoenas against pharmaceutical company Ranbaxy Laboratories [corporate website], which the government suspected of fraud, mislabeling its products, conspiracy and making false statements in violation of federal law. The motion also alleged that the FDA knew of these possible violations for 18 months but took no action. In the Committee's information request, the Representatives wrote:
Unfortunately, the FDA's alleged lack of action to remove these suspect products from the market requires this Committee to review the pre-market approval inspections of all currently marketed Ranbaxy drugs, as well as any "for cause" inspections, to determine if FDA has expended the resources required to justify leaving these suspect drugs on the market.
The Committee has requested all related preapproval and investigatory documents, lists of all suppliers and laboratories that performed bioequivalency tests, and a list of all involved FDA personnel. The FDA must provide the documents within two weeks, and the Committee wants to complete its interviews by the end of August. Reuters has more.

Ranbaxy has previously come under scrutiny by the US justice system and the FDA. In 2005, US District Court Judge Dickinson Debevoise ruled [JURIST report] that Ranbaxy had to stop production of its generic version of Pfizer Inc.'s blood-pressure drug Accupril because Pfizer was likely to win a patent-infringement lawsuit filed against Ranbaxy. In June 2006, the FDA revoked its approval from a Ranbaxy dosage form center, and in February 2007, the FDA raided and closed [Financial Express report] Ranbaxy's US headquarters in New Jersey.



Link | e-mail | print | subscribe | JURIST news archive | © JURIST

For a one-stop snapshot of the latest legal news that matters, with breaking documents, new legal videos, live law-related webcasts, commentary by expert law professors and more - all updated through the day in real time, with no ads and no registration barriers - visit JURIST's homepage and check back often...


LATEST LEGAL NEWS

 Federal Reserve Board approves Wachovia-Wells Fargo merger
9:20 PM ET, October 12

 Ukraine court blocks election decree
8:48 PM ET, October 12

 Portugal parliament votes down legalization of same-sex marriage
11:15 AM ET, October 11

 click for more...

LATEST FORUM

The Credit Crisis: Taking the Long View

Douglas Branson
University of Pittsburgh
School of Law

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@pitt.edu