JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE NEWSBURSTDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.


Thursday, May 01, 2008

US Army psychologists, medics supported 'abusive' interrogations after 2003 ban: ACLU
Mike Rosen-Molina at 10:35 AM ET

[JURIST] US military personnel - including Army psychologists and medics - continued to use or support "abusive" interrogation tactics even after such methods were prohibited by a 2003 memorandum, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) [advocacy website] said Wednesday. According to documents [materials; press release] obtained by the ACLU pursuant to a 2004 Freedom of Information Act request, psychologists and medical staff were involved in interrogations the ACLU says violated their legal responsibilities and professional ethics. The documents also indicate that US medical staff at installations including Abu Ghraib prison [JURIST news archive] in Iraq failed to report potential instances of abusive interrogations.

The documents obtained by the ACLU included previously redacted information from the so-called Church Report [JURIST report], a 2005 review of US prisoner interrogation practices conducted by Vice Adm. Albert T. Church. The Pentagon released [JURIST report] an executive summary [text] and other details [DOD briefing transcript] of the review in March 2005, in association with Church's testimony [PBS Newshour report] before the US Senate Armed Services Committee. The investigation began after several photos and reports of prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib circulated in the spring of 2004. AP has more.

In August last year the American Psychological Association (APA) [official website] voted against a measure [JURIST report] that would have prevented its members from participating in interrogations of terror suspects at Guantanamo Bay and other military prisons where suspects have been tortured. The APA instead passed a resolution stating that the association opposes the use of torture and specifying what practices it finds particularly inhumane, including mock executions, sleep deprivation, and sexual humiliation.

VOTE FOR JURIST

 JURIST is nominated for a 2008 Webby Award as best Law website... Please vote for us here!






Link |  | print | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST LEGAL NEWS

 US House votes for 20-week abortion ban
3:57 PM ET, June 19

 UK Supreme Court allows families of Iraq soldiers to sue government
2:28 PM ET, June 19

 AI: China mining companies contributing to Congo rights abuses
12:51 PM ET, June 19

 click for more...

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

LATEST FORUM

Is Egypt's Stance on the Blue Nile Dam Legally Justified?
DOMESTIC
Zeray Yihdego
University of Aberdeen School of Law

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org