JURIST - Paper Chase: Federal judge rules New Hampshire prescription info law unconstitutional

[JURIST] A federal judge ruled Monday that a New Hampshire law [text] requiring that prescription information identifiable to particular doctors be kept confidential from pharmaceutical sales representatives violates the First Amendment and is unconstitutional. IMS Health and Verispan [corporate websites] filed a lawsuit [complaint, PDF; IMS case materials] last year after the law took effect, arguing that the so-called Prescription Restraint Law violates the first amendment by criminalizing their commercial and non-commercial speech, should be declared void for vagueness and overbreadth, and violates the dormant commerce clause.

According to an IMS press release [PDF text], US District Judge Paul Barbadoro found that the law "unconstitutionally restricted speech without directly serving the State's substantial interests" and that "alternatives exist that would achieve the State's interests as well as or better without restricting speech." New Hampshire Attorney General Kelly Ayotte said Monday that the state is considering appealing the decision. AP has more.

For a one-stop snapshot of the latest legal news that matters, with breaking documents, new legal videos, live law-related webcasts, commentary by expert law professors and more - all updated through the day in real time, with no ads and no registration barriers - visit JURIST's homepage and check back often...