PAPER CHASE NEWSBURSTDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.
Receive IM, Email or Mobile alerts when new content is published on this site.


Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Lethal injection protocols may violate US constitution: medical study
Jeannie Shawl at 9:50 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The three-drug "cocktail" used to execute death row inmates by lethal injection [JURIST news archive] can fail, causing inmates to suffer a painful death, according to a study [text] published Monday by PLoS Medicine [journal website]. The study's authors said in a summary of their work:
We were able to analyze only a limited number of executions. However, our findings suggest that current lethal injection protocols may not reliably effect death through the mechanisms intended, indicating a failure of design and implementation. If thiopental and potassium chloride fail to cause anesthesia and cardiac arrest, potentially aware inmates could die through pancuronium-induced asphyxiation. Thus the conventional view of lethal injection leading to an invariably peaceful and painless death is questionable.
According to the editors' summary:
The authors conclude that even if lethal injection is administered without technical error, those executed may experience suffocation, and therefore that "the conventional view of lethal injection as an invariably peaceful and painless death is questionable." The Eighth Amendment of the US Constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. The results of this paper suggest that current protocols used for lethal injection in the US probably violate this amendment.
The constitutionality of lethal injection has been a hot issue in recent months, with several states - including Florida, Maryland and California [JURIST reports] - ordering reviews of lethal injection protocols or suspending executions until the status of the death penalty can be resolved. AP has more.

Meanwhile, the American Bar Association has called on Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesden to extend a temporary moratorium on Tennessee executions [Tennessean report]. Bredesden imposed the moratorium [JURIST report] in February to allow a three-month "comprehensive review of the manner in which death sentences are administered," but the ABA said Monday that the review should be broadened [press release] "to permit a thorough review of every aspect of capital punishment administration in the state," including "excessive caseloads and inadequate standards for defense counsel" and "racial disparities and inadequate review of death row inmates' claims of actual innocence."




Link | e-mail   | print | subscribe | JURIST news archive | © JURIST

For a one-stop snapshot of the latest legal news that matters, with breaking documents, new legal videos, live law-related webcasts, commentary by expert law professors and more - all updated through the day in real time, with no ads and no registration barriers - visit JURIST's homepage and check back often...


LATEST LEGAL NEWS

 US attorney general 'conversant and alert' after collapse at speech
9:11 AM ET, November 21

 UN torture investigator calls on Europe to accept Guantanamo asylum applicants
8:26 AM ET, November 21

 ICTR recognizes Rwanda judicial improvements but denies case transfer
7:41 AM ET, November 21

 click for more...

LATEST FORUM

A National Security Court: Restoring the Balance Between Security and Justice

Amos Guiora / U. Utah

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news weblog, powered by a team of 20 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@law.pitt.edu