PAPER CHASE NEWSBURSTDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.


Wednesday, March 14, 2007

China court official insists organ donation by executed prisoners strictly regulated
Joshua Pantesco at 1:14 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] China uses the same strict organ donation procedures when accepting organs from executed criminals as any other organ donations, an anonymous senior Chinese Supreme Court [official website] official told the state Xinhua News Agency on Tuesday. The court official said that China only harvests organs from executed criminals when either the criminal or their family consents, and the consent forms are subject to the same judicial scrutiny. The official also said that most organ donors are ordinary citizens who agree to donate organs in their wills. Xinhua has more.

These statements seem to conflict with previous admissions from Chinese officials that the majority of organs for transplant come from executed prisoners. While China formally requires informed consent [JURIST report] from the prisoners or their families, doubt exists as to how the procedures are enforced. In November 2006, Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy website] demanded that China disclose organ donor statistics [JURIST report] to the public. Other critics have suggested that the organ trade is a lucrative black-market business in China relatively ignored by officials. Late last year China's State Council [official backgrounder] considered establishing a national agency to regulate organ transplants [JURIST report] in response to international pressure.



Link | e-mail   | print | subscribe | JURIST news archive | © JURIST

For a one-stop snapshot of the latest legal news that matters, with breaking documents, new legal videos, live law-related webcasts, commentary by expert law professors and more - all updated through the day in real time, with no ads and no registration barriers - visit JURIST's homepage and check back often...


LATEST LEGAL NEWS

 California high court rules same-sex marriage ban violates state constitution
1:09 PM ET, May 15

 UK ministers, MPs deadlock over proposed 42-day terror detention without charge
12:38 PM ET, May 15

 Nintendo loses $21 million patent infringement suit
12:37 PM ET, May 15

 click for more...

LATEST FORUM

Do Funeral Protests Invade Mourners' Privacy?

Christina Wells
U. Missouri School of Law

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news weblog, powered by a team of 20 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@law.pitt.edu