The Complaint asks the Court to declare that certain insurance contract provisions are void and unenforceable as the same are contrary to public policy, are unconscionable, and are ambiguous. The provisions at issue attempt to exclude from coverage loss or damage caused directly or indirectly by water, whether or not driven by wind. The Complaint states that these provisions should be strictly construed against the insurance companies who drafted the insurance policies and their exclusions. The Complaint also states that the issuance of such insurance policies violates the Mississippi Consumer Protection Act.