 |
|

Legal news from Thursday, July 14, 2005 |
 |
|


States brief ~ WI Supreme Court rules damage cap unconstitutional
Rachel Felton on July 14, 2005 3:31 PM ET

[JURIST] Leading Thursday's states brief, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled [text] today that the state's cap on medical malpractice noneconomic damage awards is unconstitutional because it violates the equal protection guarantees of the state constitution [PDF text] and the legislature's rationale for implementing the cap was too broad and speculative to accept. Noneconomic damages include compensation for mental distress, loss of enjoyment of normal activity, and loss of society and companionship. The legislature approved a $350,000 limit on such damages in medical malpractice awards, with adjustments for inflation, in 1995. Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce [official website] President James S. Haney said the ruling has "terrible implications for the Wisconsin economy." AP has more.
In other state legal news ... - A unanimous Nevada Supreme Court ruled [PDF text] Thursday that parents have no constitutional guarantee to a lawyer in legal proceedings to terminate the custody of their children. Instead, the right to counsel must be assessed on a case-by-case basis. The ruling was the result of an appeal by a mother who claimed her court-appointed attorney failed to properly represent her during a parental rights termination hearing. AP has more.
- The Wisconsin Supreme Court has denied a former police officer's request for documents relating to a 2000 sexual harassment investigation against him under the state's Open Records Law [text]. The opinion [text] found that the documents fall into an exception under the Open Records Law because they request was made during an ongoing investigation and stated, "Disclosure would also expose the names with statements of informants who were promised confidentiality for their cooperation in the internal investigation." Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson criticized the majority for "creating a rule that unfortunately can be applied in a broad array of cases to deny access to records." The law requires record holders to balance the public's interest in releasing the documents against the government's interest in keeping them private. AP has more.
- Missouri Governor Matt Blunt has repealed a 2003 early release law which allowed certain nonviolent felons with no prior prison time to seek release after serving 120 days, even though their sentence may have called for years more. According to the Missouri Department of Corrections [official website], only 44 of the 1,011 prisoner requests for early release were granted. The governor also signed additional legislation [Governor's press release] which creates new crimes; increases penalties for certain sex crimes, theft, voter fraud, and traffic offenses; and requires sex offenders whose victims are less than 14 to remain on lifetime electronic surveillance. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

International brief ~ Pakistan province passes Islamic moral policing law
D. Wes Rist on July 14, 2005 1:50 PM ET

[JURIST] Leading Thursday's international brief, Pakistan's North West Frontier Province [Wikipedia profile] has passed a controversial law [Pakistan Times report] reminiscent of Afghan regulatons under the former Taliban regime that will allow the government to monitor individuals' compliance with Islamic principles. The bill creates the office of "mohtasib," which will be filled by an Islamic cleric responsible for ensuring that Islamic values are adhered to in public places, as well as monitoring content in the media to ensure "publications are useful for the promotion of Islamic values". The bill was passed by the conservative Mutahida Majlis Amal, a six-party alliance that is the ruling party in the Frontier Province. Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain [Wikipedia profile], president of the ruling Pakistan Muslim League political party, called the bill unconstitutional and warned that it would cause tension between provincial governments and the national government. There is no word on the punishments for failure to conform to the bill. BBC News has more.
In other international legal news ... - Sources within China's 10th National People's Congress [official website] have stated that China's Criminal Procedure Law [text] has been placed on the legislative agenda for 2006 for a comprehensive revision. The sources said that legislators were especially concerned about provisions that allow torture to be used during police investigations [JURIST report] and permit evidence obtained by torture to be used in criminal proceedings. The willingness to revise the law is prompted by several high profile cases [JURIST report] where evidence obtained through torture was used to convict individuals later determined to be innocent, including one man executed for a rape/murder where the real killer was later identified and captured by police. Several Chinese academic legal experts have called the use of confessions obtained through torture to be China's "biggest unfairness" in their criminal justice system. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of China [JURIST news archive]. China Daily has local coverage.
- Director of the Asia-Pacific department of the International Federation of Journalists [advocacy website] has accused the Nepalese government [official website] of lying to the representatives of several international media rights organizations concerning the current situation of journalists in Nepal following the abolition of the elected government [JURIST report] on February 1. Jacqueline Park said that Nepalese officials had told the mission that journalists were able to write freely and had not been interfered with but that the mission had personally observed three journalists imprisoned for covering the Maoist rebellion. Park maintained that the mission's investigations had demonstrated that journalists operated under serious risk in Nepal. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of Nepal [JURIST news archive]. Kantipur Online has local coverage.
- Families of Japanese citizens kidnapped by North Korea [government website, have requested that Japan [government website] extradite Shin Gwang-su, the self-confessed kidnapper of dozens of Japanese citizens in the 1960s and '70s. Shin, held as a political prisoner in South Korea until his repatriation in 2000 and treated as a national hero in North Korea, was recently revealed as the trainer of several other known kidnappers, and Japanese police officials have filed an international arrest warrant should he ever leave North Korea. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of Japan [JURIST news archive]. Chosun Ilbo has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Senators introduce bipartisan Patriot Act extension bill
David Shucosky on July 14, 2005 9:59 AM ET

[JURIST] While amended measures to extend the Patriot Act were approved Wednesday by the House Intelligence Committee [JURIST report] and the House Judiciary Committee [JURIST report], Senators introduced their own bipartisan bill setting restrictions and time limits. SB 1389, introduced by Arlen Specter (R-PA) and Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) [official website] would provide for increased reporting of how the act is used, increase requirements for certain warrants, wiretaps, and electronic monitoring, and make three controversial parts of the act - including roving wiretaps and library monitoring [New York Times report] temporary rather than permanent. Senator Feinstein's office has issued a press release. The Bush Administration has pushed for a complete renewal of the act, while civil liberties groups and Russ Feingold (D-WI), the only Senator to vote against the original Patriot Act [Senate floor speech, October 2001], said the new legislation doesn't do enough to protect individual rights. The Washington Post has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Annan backs Security Council expansion; US still opposes G-4 plan
David Shucosky on July 14, 2005 9:32 AM ET

[JURIST] As UN General Assembly debate continued Wednesday on a proposed expansion of the UN Security Council, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan weighed in on the general proposition, telling reporters, "The council can be more democratic and more representative." The US supports expansion in principle [US General Assembly address], but is opposed the so-called G-4 plan [JURIST report], which would add six permanent seats and four rotating seats to the 15-nation council, although veto powers would not be expanded beyond the present "Big Five" of the US, Russia, China, France, and the UK. Russia and China are also opposed [Xinhuanet report] to the G-4 draft, but France and England approve. The proposal, requiring 128 votes in the 191-nation General Assembly to pass, seems likely to fail [AP report]. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|