PAPER CHASE NEWSBURST
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.


Wednesday, November 03, 2004

Ballot issues ~ AK won't legalize pot, CA voters say no to 3 strikes limits, yes to DNA samples, stem cell research
Jeannie Shawl at 6:33 AM ET

[JURIST Election Special] Updated results are now available on several ballot initiatives followed during tonight's election coverage on JURIST's Paper Chase:

Alaska voters considered a measure legalizing marijuana. An early lead for supporters of legalization evaporated as more returns came in. With 96% of precincts reporting:

Yes - 103,440 (43%)
No - 136, 218 (57%)

Oregon voters considered Measure 35, limiting damages in medical malpractice. With 88% of precincts reporting:

Yes - 735,068 (49.95%)
No - 735,563 (50.05%)

California voters considered Proposition 66 (limits on "three strikes"), Proposition 69 (DNA sample collection) and Proposition 71 (bonds for stem cell research). With 92% of precincts reporting, it appears that the DNA sample and stem cell research measures have passed but that California will not be limiting its current three strikes law. An almost even split on the issue ultimately turned to "No" as the ballots were counted:

66 (3 Strikes Limits): Yes - 4,314,263 (46.9%); No: 4,876,217 (53.1%)
69 (DNA Samples): Yes - 5,549,821 (61.7%); No: 3,451,515 (38.3%)
71 (Stem Cell Research): Yes - 5,443,799 (59.3%); No: 3,738,259 (40.7%)

Nevada voters decided questions on penalizing lawyers involved in frivolous lawsuits and voting by "idiots or insane persons."

Question 5 (penalizing lawyers): Yes - 292,548 (36.12%); No: 494,598 (61.06%)
Question 7 (voting by "idiots"): Yes - 416,272 (52.53%); No: 349,955 (44.16%)

State constitutional amendments banning same-sex marriage (and in some states, civil unions) passed in all 11 states considering the issue. Opponents to the amendments were most hopeful that the measure would be defeated in Oregon, but the latest results, with 88% of precincts reporting, show:

Yes - 862,945 (57%)
No - 655,055 (43%)



Link | e-mail report   | how to subscribe | JURIST news archive | © JURIST

For a one-stop snapshot of the latest legal news that matters, with breaking documents, new legal videos, live law-related webcasts, commentary by expert law professors and more - all updated through the day in real time, with no ads and no registration barriers - visit JURIST's homepage and check back often...


LATEST LEGAL NEWS

 Pakistan party talks on restoring judges fail despite US intervention
7:52 PM ET, May 11

 DOJ Blackwater probe focused on guards, not company: AP
7:15 PM ET, May 11

 Stevens suggests Derby horse euthanized more humanely than prisoners
6:25 PM ET, May 11

 click for more...

LATEST FORUM

Prosecute the Lawyers Too

Marjorie Cohn
Thomas Jefferson Schl. Law

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news weblog, powered by a team of 20 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@law.pitt.edu