JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.

Wednesday, September 29, 2004

Federal judge rules section of Patriot Act unconstitutional
Chris Buell at 1:00 PM ET

US District Judge Victor Marrero ruled Wednesday that the section of the US Patriot Act allowing authorities to demand financial records from companies in terrorism investigations is unconstitutional.

Marrero concluded that the section bars any effective judicial challenge because the government does not need to show a compelling need for the information, and the act does not provide process for challenges to police action. The ACLU had brought the challenge to the provision. JURIST's Paper Chase has coverage of Patriot Act issues. Reuters has more.

UPDATE: Doe v. Ashcroft is now online here [PDF; 122 pages]. ACLU materials on the case are available here.

Link |  | print | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


 UN rights chief calls for end to fighting in eastern Ukraine
9:36 PM ET, July 28

 Congressman introduces bill to legalize marijuana oil
8:20 PM ET, July 28

 Federal Judge declares DC gun law unconstitutional
3:20 PM ET, July 27

 click for more...

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!


Unprecedented Notice of Warrantless Wiretapping in a Closed Case
Ramzi Kassem
CUNY School of Law


Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.


Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org