|
|
Books-on-Law Home || Book Reviews || Book Notices || Publishers || Archive ————————————————————————————— JURIST: Books-on-Law is edited by Ronald K.L. Collins and David Skover of the Seattle University School of Law Editorial Consultants: ![]() ————————————————————————————— In a world where nothing is sacred, this issue of Books-on-Law opens with a provocative essay (by David Lowenthal) in defense of censorship. (Uninhibited responses are welcome in our Talkback section.) Moving from the modern to the postmodern, the first review (by the editors) looks at a new and thought-provoking book on censorship. Following all this talk about talk, there are reviews of books dealing with jurisprudence (Stanley Fish with a reply by Shane ONeill), property law (Gregory Alexander), tax law (Ellen P. Aprill), criminal law and gender (Nadine Taub), constitutional law (Russell R. Wheeler) and law and language (Douglas Litowitz). Book Publishing: Lewinsky Law -- Future, Past, & Present New Yorker writer Jeffrey Toobin has closed a deal with Random House to write a book about the Clinton-Lewinsky relationship. Among other things, the work will examine the various legal issues raised by the scandal and related issues concerning the role of Kenneth Starr and the Office of the Independent Counsel. The book is scheduled for publication sometime next year. Toobin (a Harvard Law grad) was one of the Iran-contra prosecutors. In addition to writing for the New Yorker, he is also a legal commentator for ABC and is the author of From the Opening Arguments: A Young Lawyers First Case: United States v. Oliver North (Viking 1991). More recently, he authored the best-selling The Run of His Life (Random House 1995), an account of the O.J. Simpson case.
—————————————————————————————
————————————————————————————— The Authors & Editors of the Starr Report (vol. 1) Word has it that the lurid report about our Commander-in-Chief was authored by everybody other than the person after whom it is named. Our sources (NY Times, Legal Times, & others) reveal that the document was prepared by several lawyers, with the primary work being done by Stephen Bates (literary editor for the Wilson Quarterly and former Playboy contributor) and Brett Kavanaugh (partner in Kirkland & Ellis and former Scalia law clerk). Other major contributors to the scandal-mongering report about our Top Man: Craig Lerner (a 1994 Harvard Law graduate and Whitewater investigator) and Andrew D. Leipold (University of Illinois law professor and former Powell law clerk). Still other contributors to the debauched report about our debauched leader: Gregory Maggs (George Washington University law professor and former law clerk to Kennedy & Thomas) and William E. Kelley (Notre Dame law professor, former law clerk to Burger & Scalia). And then there are the advisors who helped with the controversial report about the forever controversial Bill Clinton: law professors Ronald J. Mann (University of Michigan and former Powell law clerk), Ronald Rotunda (University of Illinois), and Samuel Dash (Georgetown University and former counsel to the Senate Watergate Committee). (For more, see Karen Alexanders "Who Wrote What in the Starr Report," Legal Times, Sept. 14, 1998, p. 18.) Question: So when does the second volume of the Starr Report come out? Who will author it? Will it have, well, prurient (and legal) appeal? Stay tuned. The Provocative Legal Philosopher "There is nothing quite like the exhilarating experience that comes from reading a provocative new piece of legal thought," is how he once put it. Well, thats not all he writes. The Enchantment of Reason (Duke University Press, 1998) is his third book in the last two years. For those who reveled in Laying Down the Law (New York University Press, 1996) and Against the Law (Duke University Press, 1996, with Campos & Smith), there is this yet bolder installment of Professor Pierre Schlags venture into critical jurisprudence. Schlag (University of Colorado Law) diagnoses what he terms as an "epidemic of pathological reliance on the principle of reason." "The call to reason," he argues, "has become a manipulative vehicle of power, faith, and prejudice." This is a book destined (and designed?) to tick off the likes of Sunstein and Dworkin, among many others. For an earlier -- albeit a more restrained -- work of a somewhat similar nature, see Tactics of Legal Reasoning (Carolina Academic Press, 1986) by Pierre Schlag & David Skover. Schlag, by the way, was once (in another life) a lawyer for Covington & Burling. In his early writings (dare we add?) he wrote about doctrinal matters such as the Exclusionary Rule (73 J. Criminal Law & Criminology 875 (1982). The new Schlag, by contrast, has dumped doctrine in favor of critical thinking. Look out, you old doctrinalists! Next Issue: Arthur Linton Corbin & Others The November issue of Books-on-Law will contain the following reviews: Past-Perfect:
Book Reviews:
Ronald K.L. Collins & David M. Skover, Editors, Books-on-Law
————————————————————————————— Board of Editorial Consultants: Raj Bhala, George Washington University Law School; Miriam Galston, George Washington University Law School; Kermit Hall, Ohio State University College of Law; Yale Kamisar, University of Michigan Law School; Lisa G. Lerman, Catholic University of America School of Law; David M. O'Brien, University of Virginia Department of Government and Foreign Affairs; Judith Resnik, Yale Law School; Edwin L. Rubin, University of Pennsylvania Law School; Steven H. Shriffrin, Cornell Law School; Nadine Strossen, New York Law School; David B. Wilkins, Harvard Law School.
Administrative Assistant for Books-on-Law: Ms. Nancy Ammons
© Ronald K.L. Collins and David Skover, 1998.
NOTICE
|