JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh

HOTLINE BUZZ
Real-time comments on legal news by newsmakers, activists, legal experts and special guests...

 Tuesday, May 13, 2008

US offloading Guantanamo detainees to face uncertain justice in Afghanistan
9:05 AM ET

Khalid Sekander [former legal advisor to USAID]: "The U.S. Supreme Court said in 2006 that military commissions to try Guantanamo detainees were unconstitutional because they violated Common Article 3, Geneva Conventions, which states that detainees must be treated humanely and be afforded the same judicial guarantees "which are recognized as indispensable by civilized people." So earlier this month the U.S. shipped five of the Afghan-based Guantanamo detainees to Afghanistan so that the Afghan legal system can try to treat them humanely and afford them those judicial guarantees recognized by civilized peoples.

The U.S. has high hopes the Afghan legal system can dispense justice in spite of possessing specific knowledge the Afghan legal system is still not functional after 30 years of war and despite law reform efforts capably led by the Italian government. No doubt the detainees are expected to defend against a system unequipped to satisfy international legal standards, including those protections recognized by civilized peoples, such as evidentiary standards, the right to defense attorneys, and a meaningful opportunity to cross-exam witnesses, among many others.

At least the U.S. is off the hook."


Opinions expressed in JURIST's Hotline are the sole responsibility of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of JURIST's editors, staff, or the University of Pittsburgh.



Link | how to subscribe | © JURIST


LATEST COMMENTS

 Stevens opinion contains seeds of victory for animal welfare movement
May 5, 2010

 Spain leads way in effort to resettle Guantanamo detainees
May 5, 2010

 click for more...

CONTACT

E-mail your comments on this blog or anything else on JURIST to JURIST@jurist.org