HOTLINE BUZZ
Real-time perspectives on legal news by newsmakers, activists, legal experts and special guests...


Wednesday, October 11, 2006


No Armenian 'genocide' in 1915
8:44 PM ET

His Excellency Nabi Sensoy, Ambassador of the Republic of Turkey [Turkish Embassy, Washington DC]: "During the First World War the Ottoman government was fighting for survival against the Entente powers. A situation of extreme danger existed as a result of serious military setbacks. Many Armenians sided with the enemy and for the defeat of the Ottoman Empire. They were actively engaged in subversive activities and in armed fight against the Ottoman army. Thus the Armenian people had thrown in their lot with the Entente cause and were arrayed against the Ottoman forces in a fateful struggle. Used by Russians in their armed hostilities with the Ottoman Empire in eastern Anatolia and by the British and the French in Cilicia, the Armenians were without doubt a threat to security. The Ottoman government had to secure its position by removing the Armenians from strategic points where they were assisting the enemy and were attacking the civilian population. The Sublime Porte did not instruct or plan the annihilation of the Armenian population in 1915, as some argue. What it did was to order the relocation of the Armenians from areas made sensitive by the progress of war.

Since genocide is now a technical term in international law, the definition established by the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide of 1948 has assumed prima-facie authority, and it is with this definition that one should assess the applicability of the concept of genocide to the Armenian events of 1915. The initial phrase of Article 2 of the convention addresses the fundamental element of the crime of genocide, that is, the ‘intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.’ Practically all legal scholars accept the centrality of this clause. Genocide thus covers a precisely-defined range of prohibited conduct only when that conduct is intentionally undertaken. Up to now no direct and objective evidence of malicious intention in the Armenian case is manifest. Ottoman archives in Istanbul are replete with government decrees and regulations proving the contrary. As the classification process is completed, more documents are becoming available to researchers. Access to the Ottoman archives through the Internet is possible. On 10 April 2005 Turkey extended an invitation to Armenia to establish a joint commission consisting of historians and other experts from the two countries to study the events of 1915 not only in the archives of Turkey and Armenia but also in the archives of all relevant the third countries and to share their findings with the international public. The Armenian government has so far failed to accept the call."




Link | e-mail post   | post comment | how to subscribe | © JURIST

Comments:

In the West, many are discouraged and even threatened for expressing “any” opinion that contradicts the Armenian thesis. Nevertheless, Turkey is constantly being criticized for doing the same. This double standard of implementation of criticism must be stopped and Turkish opinion must be listen in an open and free social environment particularly throughout the academic and the political environs. One can only decide on truth by listening all the sides. Whether Turkey is right or wrong cannot be decided by silencing those who speak up.

October 21, 2006  


LATEST COMMENTS

 Third Circuit favors free speech in striking down broad abortion clinic protest zones
November 6, 2009

 Nokia's infringement suit against Apple illustrates need to scrap US patent system
November 5, 2009

 Lake case sets important precedent that metadata is part of a requested document
November 4, 2009

 click for more...

FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Instantly share insights on the latest US and world legal news with thousands of legal scholars, policymakers, journalists and others. Posts here also run on JURIST's front page and are archived with our coverage of over 100 legal news topics. If you're already registered with JURIST sign in here, or e-mail JURIST@law.pitt.edu for passwords. You can also e-mail your comments for later posting - be sure to put HOTLINE in the subject line of your e-mail. JURIST reserves the right to edit or decline submissions.

LOCATIONS OF LATEST READERS

Denver, Colorado, United States2:14 PM ET

United States2:14 PM ET

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada2:14 PM ET

Baltimore, Maryland, United States2:14 PM ET

Preston, Washington, United States2:12 PM ET


Powered by MapStats | refresh

ARCHIVE

Hotline has a monthly archive of legal news comments.


HOTLINE SEARCH

Search JURIST's news comments archive...


Powered by Blogdigger badge

CONTACT

E-mail your comments on this blog or anything else on JURIST to Hibbitts@law.pitt.edu