FORUM
Op-eds on legal news by law professors and JURIST special guests...

Gonzales' Troubling Legacy

JURIST Contributing Editor Peter Shane of Moritz College of Law, Ohio State University, says that the resignation of Alberto Gonzales as US Attorney General creates welcome potential for a new direction at a Justice Department politicized and tainted by his fervent embrace of executive power...


One can only hope that today's resignation of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales marks a turning point back to the rule of law in the regulation of executive branch affairs.

Administration backers may hope that Gonzales' successor will be equally fervent in his assertion of presidential prerogative, equally stubborn in the practice of executive branch secrecy, and equally partisan in his willingness to politicize all levels of the Department of Justice. That scenario is unlikely.

The President will not be able to get a Gonzales clone confirmed as Attorney General with the Senate under Democratic control. The Judiciary Committee will insist on a level of openness and cooperation that the Administration has so far been unwilling to provide.

ALSO ON JURIST

 Topic: Alberto Gonzales | Topic: US Justice Department | News: Gonzales resigns as US attorney general

The President could fill the post through a recess appointee, but only at some serious political cost. Congress will not give a recess appointee either the informal deference or the formal legal authority that the White House would want. Especially with a permanent rewrite of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act under discussion, a recess appointee would seriously weaken the Justice Department's position.

As for Gonzales himself, it seem unlikely that his resignation will either increase or decrease his legal vulnerability to congressional subpoenas or his legal capacity to assert executive privilege on particular matters. If possible, however, he now finds himself in an even weaker political position, which could affect the public positions he is able to advocate with any force.

Perhaps the best development for Gonzales is that his resignation likely makes his impeachment a political non-starter. He is not technically immune from impeachment. The only other cabinet official ever impeached, Secretary of War William Belknap, was tried after he had resigned. Because a potential penalty for impeachment is disqualification from federal office, in addition to removal, such a proceeding would not be legally meaningless. Yet, it surely will not happen.

Alberto Gonzales is likely to be remembered for his double-barreled disservice to the law. First, his lack of awareness, concern, or both with respect to the politicization of the Justice Department, combined with his inability to provide a candid, cogent, and consistent explanation for the Department's behavior has demoralized the career lawyers and line prosecutors who are the Department's heart and soul. It will take years to repair the damage.

Second, as White House Counsel and, then, as Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales was a central figure in advancing the most audacious and unjustified claims in American history on behalf of inherent presidential authority. When the two words most likely associated in the public mind with your government service are "torture memo," your legacy is not a good one.


Peter M. Shane is the Jacob E. Davis and Jacob E. Davis II Chair in Law at Ohio State’s Moritz College of Law.


August 27, 2007


Link | | e-mail op-ed | print | post comment | 3 comments | how to subscribe | © JURIST

Comments:

It will take years to repair the damage.

A recurring theme for this Bush administration from foreign affairs, international standing, energy policy, global warming policy, infrastructure deferred maintenance, balance of trade deficit, federal deficit, work place safety, usw.

August 27, 2007  

From reading several of Mr. Shane's editorials, it is quite obvious he has an axe to grind and no love lost for President Bush or Conservatives in general. This whole issue of the firings is ridiculous. Where was the outcry when Janet Reno fired ALL 93 US attorneys? What Mr. Gonzales is being held to account for simply pales in comparison to that.

August 27, 2007  

Either you are completely clueless or as much an enabler as any GW zombie. The fact of the matter is that EVERY incoming administration replaces the politically appointed attorneys at the beginning of the term in office. What Ms. Reno DIDN'T do is cherry-pick the ones who weren't political enough to fire half-way through her mandate.

The point is that the administration has the right and obligation to set the emphasis and general direction the DOJ will follow. What they shouldn't do is subvert the rule of law to political considerations in the process.

August 27, 2007  


LATEST OP-EDS

 Arizona Legalizes Racial Profiling
April 27, 2010

 The Iraqi High Court's Understated Rise to Legitimacy
April 23, 2010

 Is Health Care Reform Constitutional?
April 21, 2010

 Not Child's Play: Revisiting the Law of Child Soldiers
April 13, 2010

 click for more...

Get JURIST legal news on your intranet, website, blog or news reader!

SUBMISSIONS

E-mail Forum submissions (about 1000 words in length - no footnotes, please) to JURIST@pitt.edu.

SYNDICATION

Add Forum op-eds to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL

E-MAIL

Subscribe to Forum op-ed alerts via R|mail. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.
MyBlogAlerts also e-mails alerts of new Forum op-eds. It's free and fast, but ad-based.

FORUM SEARCH

Search JURIST's op-ed archive...


Powered by Blogdigger badge

CONTACT

JURIST and our op-ed authors welcome comments and reaction from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@law.pitt.edu