FORUM
Op-eds on legal news by law professors and JURIST special guests...

Beirut Bleeding: Law Under Attack in Lebanon

JURIST Special Guest Columnists Gaby El Hakim and Joe Karam, Lebanese lawyers and board members of the Beirut Bar Association, say indiscriminate Israeli attacks on Lebanese civilians violate all principles of international humanitarian law and call for an immediate ceasefire and concerted negotiations to end the violence and restore a fully-sovereign Lebanon...


In the past thirteen days, Israeli raids on Lebanon have killed hundreds of innocent women and children and destroyed thousands of houses in Beirut and the Bekaa Valley, burying their residents under rubble and demolishing our country’s infrastructure.

Israel has thus turned Lebanon - a country with a fascinating history and a civilization that is the wellspring of the alphabet - into a war region needing billions of dollars to recover after a senseless conflict. Its criminal and brutal acts have been carried out while the international community has stood by and watched.

Throughout our history, Lebanon has been subject to many wars which started on its soil and beneath its sky, sometimes for a reason and sometimes without a reason. Lebanon has been the victim of conflict, and disorder has only been fed by Middle East policymakers aiming to manipulate small countries for their own benefit. But the Lebanese people with their determination and their willingness to fight to rebuild their nation have always recovered.

ALSO ON JURIST

 Topic: Middle East Conflict | Video: Middle East crisis meeting [UN Security Council]

Now we have witnessed the evacuation of all foreign nationals from Lebanon, a situation that suggests an imminent war on an even bigger scale, once the evacuation is completed, that will leave Lebanon behind to be unfairly destroyed by Israel.

By killing civilians in Lebanon, Israel is breaching all the treaties and international humanitarian laws that stipulate that it is only legal and ethical to attack valid military targets by distinguishing them and attacking them separately (i.e. dividing a district containing several military objectives into sub-targets and consequently attacking each target separately, rather that attacking the whole area). Israel is using what is often called in the war dictionary “carpet bombing” or “area bombardment”. To quote from an article by international law scholar Horst Fischer in the book Crimes of War:
An explicit ban on area bombardment was first codified in the 1977 Additional Protocol 1, which applies to bombardments of cities, towns, villages, or other areas containing a concentration of civilians. An attack by bombardments by any methods or means that treats as a single military objective, a number of clearly separated and distinct military objectives is considered to be an indiscriminate attack and is prohibited. Launching such an attack in the knowledge that it will cause excessive loss of life, injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects is considered a grave breach”. [emphasis added]
Israeli forces are committing indiscriminate attacks by attacking civilians, innocent women and children, thus ignoring all the ethics of war specified in the Geneva Convention as well as in other war protocols and violating humanitarian law. The Hezbollah resistance militia has likewise violated the safety of civilians by firing sporadic Katyucha rockets on Israeli towns and villages.

We believe that what is happening today stretches far beyond the issue of the prisoner exchange; Israel is imposing a collective sentence upon innocent Lebanese people for the wrong reasons.

Although Lebanon informed Israel that the Lebanese government and the Lebanese people were not aware of, and did not approve the kidnapping of the two Israeli soldiers by Hezbollah, Israel has not recognized this fact, and is still insisting on holding all the Lebanese people responsible for a politically motivated decision taken by a specific party with regional affiliations.

We believe that the current chaos is the result of an international policy which manages the crisis in Lebanon specifically and in the Middle East in general in favor of some countries, instead of stopping it from spreading and solving the problem at its roots.

The main reason of the crisis and disorder in the Middle East is the adoption of a double standard, so that victims from one side do not have the same value as those on another side! Accountability is not universal in this Middle East, and the rule of law does not always prevail always as a universal principle. Many policymakers brainwash countries and communities and manipulate them, making them believe that they are fighting for their rights and existence while they are in reality serving other peoples' interests.

Despite the fact that leaders from all countries agree that true democracies should prevail in the Middle East and that peace and freedom and the rule of law should arise, we still find them adopting double standards, thus violating the principle of justice known as impartiality, based on the assumption that the same standards should be applied to all people, without regard to subjective based on ethnicity, class, gender or other distinction. In this respect we find some recent political speeches which have appeared to distinguish between the civilians killed in Lebanon and Israel to be outrageous, emphasizing the double standard principle instead of neglecting it.

In line with the above, we would like to remind the international community that the war decision in Lebanon was not taken by the government and therefore it does not involve the country as such, and for that reason more restraints must be considered in this situation.

We as Lebanese lawyers and citizens ask the United Nations to help us reach an immediate ceasefire and to help us impose the Lebanese government's sovereignty on all its territories in order to save the Lebanese people from the violent military campaigns conducted by Israel, as well as to save our country from serving other countries' interests aiming to destroy its industry and devastate the entire population.

A very relevant remark was made on CNN recently by an Israeli whose house in Haifa was hit by a Hezbollah missile. The reporter asked him, “What are your feelings?” He answered: “We have to talk to the enemy. The violence will never end this way. I still believe that negotiation and peace is the only way”. Violence in the Middle East will never end until real negotiation takes place and a truly neutral mediator seeks real understanding of the needs of each party.


Gaby El Hakim is a lawyer in Beirut, Lebanon, and a board member of the Beirut Bar Association Commission on Sport.

Joe E. Karam, also a lawyer from Beirut, is a board member of the Beirut Bar Association's Commission on International Relations, and Editor of the
AIJA Law Journal printed in Brussels. He is currently stranded in Washington, DC, having boarded the last flight out of Beirut's Rafik Hariri International Airport on July 12 before it was attacked by Israeli warplanes.

July 24, 2006


Link | | e-mail op-ed | print | post comment | 6 comments | how to subscribe | © JURIST

Comments:

I would like to put the record straight on a few facts.
1. Israel has suffered rocket attacks from Hezbollah for the past 6 years.
2. 'sporadic rocket attacks?' Hundreds of katyuchas have rained down on northern Israel in the past few days.
3.Israel's borders were violated by Hezbollah and their soldiers killed and 2 kidnapped.
3. What country in the world would have tolerated such aggression on its soverign soil?
4. The reason there are so many casualties is because Hezbollah is firing their rockets from densely populated areas of houses and villages of southern Lebanon inviting Israel to retaliate cynically exposing civilians to certain death. This is being done to exploit the ensuing propaganda that will follow such deaths. If they care so much for the population why don't they fire their rockets from open spaces far away from the populated areas?
Hezbollah couldn't care less about the Lebanese people.
Why on earth did the Lebanese people allow their country to be hijacked and their government held to ransome by a terrorist organisation?

July 25, 2006  

The UN humanitarian chief accused Hezbollah late Monday of "cowardly blending" among Lebanese civilians and causing the deaths of hundreds during two weeks of cross-border violence with Israel.

So much for Israeli attacks. According to the UN they are justified.

July 25, 2006  

Thank you for your cogent argument. This is a perspective not represented in our corporate controlled media--

We will not have peace until we recognize the value of all human beings, but also, we have to find a mechanism for bringing war criminals to justice.

June, I would ask you the same question you ask of Lebanon. Why on earth did the Israeli people allow their government to be taken over by war criminals? And the same question to US citizens...

Terror is terror, whether its state driven or conducted by a rogue organization. The only difference is the states in question have more bombs and are more deadly....

Israel has carpet bombed Lebanon. Israel is soley responsible for the results of its own actions.

This is not to say Hezbollah should not be held accountable for its actions, but the Israeli reaction is counterproductive to peace in the region and has caused a huge humanitarian crisis.

July 25, 2006  

In partial response to "june" who said:
"3.Israel's borders were violated by Hezbollah and their soldiers killed and 2 kidnapped."

Here are more facts to put the record straight:

A) Lebanon's borders have been systematically violated by Israel on a regular basis for the last 6 years in the form of illegal over-flights. Israel has ignored UN calls to end this practice.

B) Israel kidnapped two Lebanese (Mustafa Dirani and Sheikh Abdel Karim Obeid) in the 80's, pre-dating the latest kidnappings by 2 decades.

C) Within the last month, Israel detained and is holding about 1/3 of the PA's gov't leaders without charges. They are being held as bargining chips to release a soldier held by Hamas.

Israel's hands are not clean either.

July 25, 2006  

There is a real simple answer to all of the above. If Hamas, Fatah and Hezbollah would lay down their arms and recognize Israel's right to exist, the 60 year conflict is over. Period. If Israel lays down her arms, every Israeli will be die at the hands of Hamas, Fatah and Hezbollah. The moment you realize the truth in these statements is the moment you will determine the resolution of this conflict.

July 25, 2006  

The double standard that allows war criminals to run countries like Israel and the United States will ultimately be the downfall of us all. Israel has become the very thing they claim to abhor - an indiscriminate murderer of innocents, using only the ethnicity of it's victims as the "moral authority" for their [clearly illegal and totally immoral] actions.

How is it that we here in the US believe that we can sanction this type of genocide, yet not have to worry about the consequences?

July 25, 2006  


LATEST OP-EDS

 A Risk Worth Taking: Civilian Trials for Guantanamo Terror Suspects
November 16, 2009

 Simple Justice: Time for the US to Support the ICC
November 13, 2009

 Beyond Guantanamo
November 6, 2009

 Goldstone, Gaza and (Dis)Proportionality: Three Strikes
November 4, 2009

 click for more...

Get JURIST legal news on your intranet, website, blog or news reader!

SUBMISSIONS

E-mail Forum submissions (about 1000 words in length - no footnotes, please) to JURIST@pitt.edu.

SYNDICATION

Add Forum op-eds to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL

E-MAIL

Subscribe to Forum op-ed alerts via R|mail. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.
MyBlogAlerts also e-mails alerts of new Forum op-eds. It's free and fast, but ad-based.

FORUM SEARCH

Search JURIST's op-ed archive...


Powered by Blogdigger badge

CONTACT

JURIST and our op-ed authors welcome comments and reaction from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@law.pitt.edu